Blinky's Lab
Posted on
Geiger Muller Tubes

J306, J307 & J308 Geiger Muller Tube Background Comparison

Author

I got these tubes just to see what they were like. I was a little surprised to learn that they are black due to a sleeve of heat shrink over the tube. I had previously thought they were black due to them being an opaque glass, but after peeling a little of the sleeve off it revealed tin oxide coated clear glass, much like the J305. I accidentally rubbed the markings from the J306 when cleaning it, as I have done on a J305. The markings come off very easy with these tubes.

enter image description here Going from top to bottom - J306, J307 then J308.

enter image description here enter image description here

Specs from Alibaba: enter image description here

Below is the background comparison result. Each tube was left to run for around 30 days, although the first (J306) was short by a few days.

enter image description here

I think the graph says it all. This was a simple background test for each tube. I simply threw it on a counter and left if for days and let radmon.org log the results. The J308 seems a little underwhelming at around double that of a J305. The J307, despite it's length (it's the longest) was kind of miserable too. I initially expected something around 90-100 CPM. It seems circumference matters with these tubes. That makes sense, larger circumference, larger capture area. The J306 came out on top and gave similar results to a similar sized metal wall SI-22G. Prices were (all including tax and shipping): J306 - £24.59, J307 - £24.59 and J308 - £25.88. The J308 was bought separately, so the cost was slightly higher with shipping. The J306, J307 & J308 are all the same price from the seller, and I have to wonder why. AliExpress I guess! 😄 Bought from here: https://vi.aliexpress.com/item/1005005407840365.html

Archived from radmon.org - originally posted 06/04/2025

Add Comment

* Required information
1000
Captcha Image
Powered by Commentics

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first!